Optimized hydromodification management with active stormwater controls

ABSTRACT

A system, methodology, and programming logic for active stormwater controls to optimize sizing and design of Hydromodification Management (HM) structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to achieve optimal flow duration control. Control logic enables the controlled release of stormwater from a BMP in a manner most akin to pre-development flow duration curves. Inputs to this logic include: flow duration curves based on continuous hydrologic simulation for pre- and post-development conditions; real-time measurement of water level within the BMP; and real-time measurement of discharge entering the BMP. This control logic can interact with control logic for other stormwater management objectives, such as harvest and reuse, infiltration, and combined sewer overflow prevention, and respective inputs, such as real-time weather forecast data, precipitation gage data, downstream flow gauge data, and water quality data, to meet those design objectives as well. New HM BMPs can be optimized to be smaller and, thus, more feasible to implement. Existing stormwater facilities designed for flood control or other management objectives can be retrofitted to provide hydromodification control as well. When utilized with real-time flow and water level monitoring equipment and data, the flow release logic can be adaptively adjusted without physical retrofit of the BMP&#39;s outlet.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

N/A

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Hydromodification is defined as changes in runoff characteristics andin-stream processes caused by altered land use. With regard tourbanization, when areas are rendered impervious with asphalt, concrete,and roofs, and runoff is conveyed directly to streams via theconventional storm drain system, natural storage in vegetation andinfiltration into soil is reduced and overland flow increases. As aresult, the magnitude and duration of flow rates entering receivingstreams or other channels increases, which contributes to more erosiveenergy within the channel. Unless managed, hydromodification can causeimpacts including channel erosion and results in biological impacts tostream systems as well as infrastructure.

The state of the practice for hydromodification management for new urbandevelopment is to mimic long-term pre-development site hydrology. Thetheory is that if the pre-development distribution of in-stream flows ismaintained, then the baseline capacity to transport sediment, a proxyfor the geomorphic condition, will be maintained as well. A popularmethod of mimicking the pre-development flow regime is via flow durationcontrol. This can be done by routing post-development runoff throughstormwater detention facilities, also termed structural Best ManagementPractices (BMPs), such that runoff is stored and slowly released tomatch pre-development flow rates and durations. Sizing suchHydromodification Management (HM) BMPs relies on continuous hydrologicsimulation of both the pre- and post-development conditions anditerative design of the stormwater facility geometry and outletconfiguration until flow duration control is achieved. As it turns out,storage requirements for flow duration control tend to be much largerthan that for surface water treatment requirements, particularly whenthe stormwater facilities are small, distributed facilities with simpleoutlet structures, such as those designed for Low Impact Development(LID). These larger HM BMPs tend to: add cost to construction; bedifficult to situate on a project site; and have long drawdown timesresulting in vector control concerns.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is a system, methodology and programming logic for activestormwater controls to optimize sizing and design of HM BMPs and toachieve optimal flow duration control. The basic system outletconfiguration can consist of (but is not limited to) a modulating valve,orifice, or pump at the bottom of the BMP and an overflow weir at thetop of the BMP. Inputs to the control logic include (but are not limitedto): flow duration curves based on continuous hydrologic simulation forthe pre- and post-development conditions; real-time measurement of waterlevel within the BMP; and real-time measurement of discharge enteringthe BMP (which can also be measured based on the rate of change of waterlevel and discharge exiting the BMP). If a BMP has stormwater managementobjectives other than hydromodification management alone (e.g., harvestand reuse, infiltration, first flush capture, flood control, combinedsewer overflow prevention, watershed integrated scour control, etc.)then, the methodology can be used in combination with other programminglogic controls and their associated inputs (e.g., real-time weatherforecast data, precipitation gage data, downstream flow gauge data,downstream sediment transport data, soil moisture data, reuse demanddata, water quality data etc.) to meet those design objectives as well.

With the use of active stormwater controls and the methodology describedherein, the benefits are three-fold. First, new HM BMPs can be optimizedto be smaller and, thus, more feasible to implement. Second, existingstormwater facilities designed for flood control or other managementobjectives can be retrofitted to provide hydromodification control aswell. Third, when utilized with real-time flow and water levelmonitoring equipment and data, the flow release logic can be adaptivelyadjusted based on calibrated data without physical retrofit of the BMP'soutlet.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention may be better understood byreferring to the following description in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A through 1E collectively provide a flow chart depicting steps ofa method for optimizing HM BMP size and design and for achieving activeflow duration control according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a graph providing example flow duration curves associated withthe method of FIGS. 1A through 1E;

FIG. 3 is an example flow rating table derived from flow duration curvessuch as depicted in FIG. 2, the flow rating table being iterativelyadapted in the optimization method of FIGS. 1A through 1E and providingparameters for optimized hydromodification management;

FIG. 4 is a generalized depiction of a structural BMP adapted for usewith the optimization and control method of FIGS. 1A through 1E;

FIG. 5 is an example of control logic code that can be employed toimplement the optimization and control method of FIG. 1A through 1E; and

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of hardwareresources that are capable of realizing the method of FIGS. 1A through1E.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A system and method utilizing active stormwater controls to optimize thesizing and design of Hydromodification Management (HM) Best ManagementPractices (BMPs) and to achieve flow duration control is disclosed. Thesystem includes programming logic for implementing the method instormwater control hardware. An efficient and robust solution to theoptimization of HM BMPs is thus provided.

An iterative method for optimizing the sizing and design of HM BMPs andfor controlling hydromodification management facilities is describedwith respect to FIGS. 1A through 1E. A generalized depiction of astormwater BMP 200 is provided in FIG. 4. In FIG. 1A, the method beginsat step 10 by creating a pre- and post-development continuous hydrologicsimulation of the drainage management area(s) of interest based upon theinput parameters selected in the hydrologic modeling program. A firstcurve, designated “Pre,” depicts a simulation of pre-development flowduration. Post-development flow duration without a BMP is analogized asthe post-development flow into a BMP and is referred to as “Post” in thegraph accompanying step 10. As is evident, the post-development flowduration is greater that the pre-development flow duration.

An enlarged view of the flow duration curves of step 10 are illustratedin FIG. 2. Here, the pre-development flow is identified as Q_(pre) andthe post-development flow into the BMP is identified as Q_(post). Anadditional curve appears in FIG. 2. This is the post-development flowwith active controls provided according to the present method, or inother words, the intended flow out of the BMP. The post-development flowinto the BMP is referred to as Q_(in) while the post-development flowout of the BMP is referred to as Q_(out).

Next, an initial flow rating table is developed based on common flowdurations of the two simulated flow records (Q_(pre) vs. Q_(post)). Anexample flow rating table so derived is shown in FIG. 3 and thecorresponding flow rating curve is shown at step 15 of FIG. 1A.

The initial flow rating curve and resulting table are then revised tocompensate for excess post-development runoff volume, relative topre-development conditions, that is managed by one or more of:infiltrating stormwater through the bottom 212 of the BMP 200;harvesting runoff for appropriate uses, such as irrigation, toilets, orother gray water uses; and/or discharging stormwater at a critical lowflow threshold (Q_(crit)) less than the contributing flow rateassociated with incipient motion of the receiving stream's bed or bankmaterial. For example, if the excess runoff volume is to be dischargedat Q_(crit), then the following logic function can be used: “if Q_(in)is less than Q_(crit), then Q_(out) is equal to Q_(crit).” At step 20 ofFIG. 1A, an example flow rating curve of Q_(out) versus Q_(in) isdepicted. Q_(out) is defined as a function of Q_(in) and Q_(crit). Aflow rating table so derived is shown in FIG. 3.

The BMP outlet configuration is then modeled. A variety of BMPconfigurations are employable. One example outlet configuration isdepicted in FIG. 4, with a bottom orifice 204 and an overflow weir 206at a given crest elevation. Note that implementing the presentlydisclosed method with respect to preexisting stormwater detentionfacilities will obviously constrain, or eliminate, the ability to choosea BMP configuration. Stages between the bottom hydraulic outlet(s) ororifice(s) 204 and the weir crest 206 elevation based on an increment ofwater level within the BMP are also defined.

The hydraulic outlet or orifice 204 dimensions are sized so that theoutlet can convey the maximum Q_(pre) identified in the simulated flowrecord at the lowest stage when the outlet 204 is fully open. Theoverflow weir width is sized such that it can convey the maximumQ_(post), or other design discharge for flood control, at the higheststage in the BMP with sufficient freeboard.

With respect to step 30 of FIG. 1B, for each stage, control curves arecreated for determining what percentage (%) of a modulating valve 210disposed within the BMP bottom orifice 204 should be open based upon theflow rating table values for the respective stage. Example controlcurves are provided in conjunction with step 30 and a control curve lookup table is provided in FIG. 3. As shown, the percentage open is afunction of Q_(out) and water depth within the BMP.

Using the control curves created in step 30, control logic code isdefined at FIG. 1B, step 40 to output the percentage open as a functionof Q_(in) and stage. Exemplary control code is illustrated in FIG. 5.The control logic code is intended for use by a modulating valve 210controller, discussed below.

A BMP stage-storage or stage-area curve is defined based on an assumedgeometric configuration, per step 50. An example of such a curve isillustrated in conjunction with step 50.

Based upon this predictive work, a record of a post-developmentsimulated flow through the BMP is then mathematically determined perstep 60. The simulated flow duration curves for pre-development andpost-development (with BMP) conditions are compared. As per FIG. 1C,step 70, an assessment is made whether, for the flow range of interest,the post-development curve matches the pre-development curve, withinsome predefined allowable tolerance. The flow range of interest istypically above Q_(crit). If the two flow curves are not sufficientlysimilar, the BMP geometric configuration is adjusted, as per step 80,and a revised BMP stage-storage curve is created (step 50) and a newhydrologic simulation is performed (step 60) before the pre- andpost-development flow duration curves are compared again (step 70).

Through this iterative process, the BMP is sized with as small afootprint as possible. For example, if the post-development flowduration curve is above the pre-development curve by some thresholdtolerance, the BMP footprint is increased. Conversely, if thepost-development flow duration curve matches the pre-development curvebut there is opportunity to achieve a similar match with a smaller BMPfootprint, the BMP footprint is decreased. If infiltration of stormwaterthrough the bottom of the BMP is feasible, the resulting BMP footprintwill be smaller than if infiltration is not utilized. Note that forretrofits of existing stormwater detention facilities, where it is notfeasible or desirable to replace an existing BMP or other facility, theiterative BMP sizing process would not be practiced. An example flowduration curve for post-development conditions with active controls isprovided in FIG. 2.

A BMP with the afore-determined geometric configuration, outletconfiguration, and control logic is then installed, per step 90.

Following installation, the water level in the BMP, the dischargeentering the BMP (Q_(in)), and the discharge exiting the BMP (Q_(out))are actively monitored, as per step 100. Sensor options for monitoringwater levels include pressure transducers and ultrasonic level sensors.Flowrate can be measured with hydraulic flume structures, if coupledwith a water level sensor, or area/velocity sensors. Alternatively,Q_(in) can also be calculated based on the rate of change of the BMPwater level, the stage-storage curve of the BMP, and Q_(out) for eachtime interval. Based upon this data, it is then possible to dynamicallyrecalibrate the continuous hydrologic model parameters, a process knownto one skilled in the art, if Q_(in) deviates from the previouslymodeled Q_(in) results by more than a predefined measure of tolerance,per steps 110 and 120. In other words, if the monitored or measuredQ_(in) differs from the previously modeled Q_(in) found in the revisedflow rating table, the hydrologic model parameters are recalibrated. Newflow duration curves for pre- and post-development (without BMP) runoffconditions, based upon the continuous hydrologic simulation, arecalculated, per FIG. 1D, step 130. Likewise, a new flow rating curve iscalculated, per step 140, and new modulating valve 210 control curvesare derived, per step 150.

Based upon the revised control curves of step 150, the control curvelook up table, such as illustrated in FIG. 3, is then reprogrammed, asper step 160.

In one embodiment, the analysis of steps 10 through 80 and 110 through160 is performed by engineering personnel with appropriate softwaretools and step 90 is performed by the qualified personnel installing theBMP. Step 100 is implemented in a hardware controller, as subsequentlydiscussed. The hardware controller is also responsible for executingcontrol logic code such as shown in FIG. 5.

Monitoring, control, and communication hardware that can be utilized topractice and perform the presently disclosed method include, forexample: pressure transducers, ultrasonic level sensors, area/velocitysensors, flow measurement flumes, and fluvial seismometers fordetermining parameters such as Q_(in), Q_(out), and water depth, area,and volume (collectively referred to as water parameter sensors);solenoid valves, slide gates with linear or other actuators, gatevalves, butterfly valves, and pinch valves with motorized or pneumaticactuators (collectively referred to as water flow regulators); andspecially programmed microprocessors, custom microcontrollers, or othercomputing devices with associated memories and communications interfacesincluding Web gateway units for interfacing to the water parametersensors, water flow regulators, and remote interfaces and controllersvia a communications network such as the Internet.

With respect to FIG. 6, the heart of a one embodiment of a systemcapable of implementing the previously disclosed method is a controldevice such as a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). This devicereceives input regarding the state of the BMP, such as an indication ofwater level from a Water Level Sensor and characteristics of the inflowor outflow. Optional additional inputs include cloud-based real-timeinputs such as lookup tables, weather forecasts, etc. For example, thePLC may be programmed to adjust output orifice control in accordancewith predicted precipitation forecasts. FIG. 6 also illustrates thecontrol path between the PLC and modulating control valve, therebyproducing discharge controlled according to the control logic code, suchas illustrated in FIG. 5. Preferably, the PLC is provided with wired orunwired Internet access, thereby enabling the PLC to be reprogrammedwith updated control logic code, per step 160 of FIG. 1E. Various othertechniques for reprogramming the PLC are also employable, as known toone skilled in the art.

It should be understood that the foregoing embodiments can employvarious computer-implemented operations involving data transferred orstored in computer systems. These operations are those requiringphysical manipulation of physical quantities. Usually, though notnecessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic, oroptical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, comparedand otherwise manipulated.

Any of the operations depicted and/or described herein that form part ofthe embodiments are useful machine operations. The embodiments alsorelate to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. Theapparatus can be specially constructed for the required purpose, or theapparatus can be a general-purpose computer selectively activated orconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. In particular,various general-purpose machines employing one or more processorscoupled to one or more computer readable medium, described below, can beused with computer programs written to implement all or a portion of themethods disclosed herein, or as noted it may be more convenient toconstruct a more specialized apparatus to perform the requiredoperations.

The disclosed systems and methods can also be embodied as computerreadable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readablemedium is any data storage device that can store data, which can bethereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computerreadable medium include hard drives, read-only memory, random-accessmemory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, DVDs, magnetic tapes and other opticaland non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium canalso be distributed over a network-coupled computer system so that thecomputer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.

The foregoing description has been directed to particular embodiments ofthis disclosure. It will be apparent, however, that other variations andmodifications may be made to the described embodiments, with theattainment of some or all of their advantages. The procedures, processesand/or modules described herein may be implemented in hardware,software, embodied as a computer-readable medium having programinstructions, firmware, or a combination thereof. For example, thefunction described herein may be performed by a processor executingprogram instructions out of a memory or other storage device. Therefore,it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations andmodifications as come within the true spirit and scope of thedisclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of enabling hydromodification managementto compensate for changes in water runoff characteristics resulting fromaltered land use, the method comprising: creating parameters of a pre-and post-development continuous hydrologic simulation model of adrainage management area of interest; defining pre- and post-developmentflow duration data based upon the hydrologic simulation; definingdesired post-development flow duration data resulting from use of flowcontrol; creating flow rating data from the defined flow duration data;defining the physical parameters of a runoff detention facility having awater outlet with a selectively adjustable opening; defining controlparameters for controlling the size of the outlet opening on the basisof the created flow rating data and the defined physical parameters;programming a controller in communication with the outlet with thecontrol parameters, the controller for controlling the outlet openingand thereby providing the flow control; and actively monitoringcharacteristics associated with the detention facility over time todefine an actual post-development flow duration.
 2. The method of claim1, further comprising: comparing the actual post-development flowduration data with the previously defined post-development flow durationdata and, if the actual post-development flow duration data differs fromthe previously defined post-development flow duration data,recalibrating the continuous hydrologic simulation model parametersbased upon the actively monitored characteristics, redefining the pre-and post-development flow duration data based upon the recalibratedhydrologic simulation model parameters, recreating the flow rating datafrom the redefined pre- and post-development flow duration data,redefining the control parameters for controlling the size of the outletopening on the basis of the recreated flow rating data and the definedphysical parameters, and reprogramming the controller with the controlparameters.
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: revising therecreated flow rating data on the basis of water diverted to excessmanagement processes associated with the hydrologic simulation model. 4.The method of claim 3, wherein the excess management processes areselected from the group consisting of detention facility infiltration,runoff harvesting, and sub-critical low flow threshold discharge.
 5. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the flow rating data comprises a flow ratingtable and corresponding flow rating curve.
 6. The method of claim 1,further comprising: revising the flow rating data on the basis of waterdiverted to excess management processes associated with the hydrologicsimulation model.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the excessmanagement processes are selected from the group consisting of detentionfacility infiltration, runoff harvesting, and sub-critical low flowthreshold discharge.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein defining thephysical parameters of the detention facility comprises defining theoutlet configuration of the detention facility.
 9. The method of claim1, wherein defining the physical parameters of the detention facilitycomprises defining a number of vertically spaced stages within thedetention facility and wherein defining the control parameters comprisesdefining a look up table of a control curve per respective stage, eachcurve defining the detention facility outlet opening according to therespective stage and detention facility in-flow.
 10. The method of claim1, further comprising: defining a detention facility stage-storage curvebased upon an assumed detention facility geometric configuration;mathematically deriving simulated post-development flow duration datathrough the assumed detention facility geometric configuration;comparing the simulated post-development flow duration data with thedefined, desired post-development flow duration data and, if thesimulated post-development flow duration data differs, within a range ofinterest by a predefined allowable tolerance, from the desiredpost-development flow duration data, repeating the steps of redefiningthe detention facility stage-storage curve based upon a revised, assumeddetention facility geometric configuration, mathematically deriving thesimulated post-development flow duration data through the redefineddetention facility geometric configuration and comparing the simulatedpost-development flow duration data with the defined, desiredpost-development flow duration data until the difference between thesimulated post-development flow duration data and the defined, desiredpost-development flow duration data, within the range of interest, iswithin the allowable tolerance.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein therange of interest of the simulated post-development flow duration dataand the defined, desired post-development flow duration data is above acritical low flow threshold.
 12. The method of claim 10, furthercomprising the step of procuring and installing the detention facilityas defined once the difference between the simulated post-developmentflow duration data and the defined, desired post-development flowduration data, within the range of interest, is within the predefinedallowable tolerance.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the activelymonitored characteristics associated with the detention facilitycomprise at least one of water level within the detention facility,detention facility in-flow rate, and detention facility out-flow rate.14. The method of claim 1, where the step of programming the controllerin communication with the outlet with the control parameters, thecontroller for controlling the outlet opening and thereby providing theflow control, comprises the controller controlling the operation of oneof a modulating valve and a pump as the outlet opening.
 15. A system forenabling hydromodification management to compensate for changes in waterrunoff characteristics resulting from altered land use, the systemcomprising: a runoff detention facility having a water inlet and a wateroutlet, the water outlet having a selectively controllable opening; atleast one sensor in communication with the detention facility forsensing one of: water in-flow rate; water out-flow rate; and watervolume within the detention facility; a controller, executing controllogic code, in communication with the water outlet for selectivelycontrolling the water outlet opening in accordance with the controllogic code; memory associated with the controller for storing thecontrol logic code; and a memory interface enabling selectivereprogramming of the control logic code within the memory; wherein thecontrol logic code is defined according to the steps of creatingparameters of a pre- and post-development continuous hydrologicsimulation model of a drainage management area of interest, definingpre- and post-development flow duration data based upon the hydrologicsimulation, defining desired post-development flow duration dataresulting from use of flow control, creating flow rating data from thedefined flow duration data, defining the physical parameters of thedetention facility and water outlet, defining control parameters forcontrolling the size of the water outlet opening on the basis of thecreated flow rating data and the defined physical parameters,programming the controller with the control parameters by downloadingthe control logic code into the memory, the controller for controllingthe water outlet opening and thereby providing the flow control on thebasis of the control parameters in the control logic code; and activelymonitoring characteristics associated with the detention facility overtime with the at least one sensor to define a measure of actualpost-development flow duration.
 16. The system of claim 15, furthercomprising: comparing the actual post-development flow duration datawith the previously defined post-development flow duration data and, ifthe actual post-development flow duration data differs from thepreviously defined post-development flow duration data, recalibratingthe continuous hydrologic simulation model parameters based upon theactively monitored characteristics, redefining the pre- andpost-development flow duration data based upon the recalibratedhydrologic simulation model parameters, recreating the flow rating datafrom the redefined pre- and post-development flow duration data,redefining the control parameters for controlling the size of the wateroutlet opening on the basis of the recreated flow rating data and thedefined physical parameters, and reprogramming the controller with thecontrol parameters by downloading the control logic code into thememory.
 17. The system of claim 16, further comprising: revising therecreated flow rating data on the basis of water diverted to excessmanagement processes associated with the hydrologic simulation model.18. The system of claim 15, wherein the flow rating data comprises aflow rating table and corresponding flow rating curve.
 19. The system ofclaim 15, further comprising: revising the flow rating data on the basisof water diverted to excess management processes associated with thehydrologic simulation model.
 20. The system of claim 15, whereindefining the physical parameters of the detention facility comprisesdefining a number of vertically spaced stages within the detentionfacility.
 21. The system of claim 15, wherein defining the physicalparameters of the detention facility comprises defining a number ofvertically spaced stages within the detention facility and whereindefining the control parameters comprises defining a look up table of acontrol curve per respective stage, each curve defining the detentionfacility water outlet opening size according to the respective stage anddetention facility in-flow.
 22. The system of claim 15, wherein theactively monitored characteristics associated with the detentionfacility comprise at least one of water level within the detentionfacility, detention facility in-flow rate, and detention facilityout-flow rate.